we are go for bloggin’ and jobbin
05:23 PM
I had an interview at the Wall Street Journal yesterday. Let me tell you, I didn’t know if bursting into tears of joy would have helped me land the job, but I was on the verge of doing it anyway. Having my potential future boss describe the job’s responsibilities, and having them match up to exactly what I enjoy doing and am good at, was one of the greatest feelings I’ve ever experienced. I am competent at something that I enjoy doing, and hot damn I could get paid for it. I know how Tomas feels about this kind of thing, but I know how he feels about a lot of things, so I’m right on track. Damn I love money, everything about it. How it represents the amount of work one’s done, how spending it means someone else is earning it, how it just keeps circulating around making us a giant community. Money brings us together, and if people don’t see it, then they can give theirs to me. Though I have yet to see anybody make it without money; and no, you can never make too much of it.
But back interviewing, without which I’d be as broke as ever. I had two yesterday, one was with Vertis, Inc. where my dad, sister, my other sister (temporarily) and possibly Dia work. I’m really not sure about working at a place with only a few people, and I’m not even sure if I’m up to whatever tasks they decide to throw my way. I have a feeling I’d have to be friends with everyone who worked there if I end up there. I’d rather throw myself into work I’m more sure I’d like and have the friendly co-workers be a bonus.
Now the WSJ interview, it was golden. I met with Cathy in the staffing office first and she asked a boatload of questions. What surprised me is that she mainly wanted to know if I was ready to move on and into corporate America. She seemed to think that the Aramark and Tracor jobs on my resume were really important experiences that showed me how to operate in the “real world”. I guess I hadn’t thought about it like that before; maybe Linda Sarnoski gave me more that that cool “wave of the future” poster and I didn’t even know it.
After the staffing interview, it was off to meet Howard, the Global Chief Paginator. Man oh man what I’d do to get that title. I was so nervous that I sort of tuned out the first thing he said to me, something about delays in the Asian and European editions. Probably not the best thing to do, but I made sure that I was with him every step of the way from there on out. Which was definitely the best thing, since the interview with his office took about an hour and a half.
I talked with Howard about layout and why I enjoy it so much, and he told me about how the section editors send over how the important things on the page should be laid out — either drawn or scripted — and the rest is up to the paginator (that’s me). After some small talk about The Triangle (mainly the crime report for some reason) and what I like to do in my free time (“You’re not on the paper anymore remember, what will you do for fun now?” he said; ouch), he showed me the layout system they use, Hermes.
The system is pretty cool. It knows what articles in the layout are too long, too short, still being worked on, have pull-quotes and captions waiting, etc. It can do some pretty fancy stuff that add precious minutes to each section’s layout. I can only pray that I’ll have a chance to use soon.
One more thing about Howard before he introduced me to two of his paginators. When he prodded me to hear what kind of movies I like, the conversation turned to Spider-Man for a second, where I was told that he “really likes that Kirsten Dunst.” He went on, “Normally I don’t like movies about cheerleaders but Drop Dead Gorgeous and Bring It On were fun because of her.” I couldn’t agree with him more. If this guy turns out to be my boss, we’ve already got one thing in common, that’s for sure. On to my potential future co-workers….
Guy #1 was pretty cool. The only thing I could have messed up was telling him that I hated the lazy bums at Aramark, because towards the end he told me that the atmosphere around the place is probably more like Aramark. Hope he didn’t take my comments the wrong way.
Guy #2 was went even better. He gave me a brief run-down, then said he’d let me go since he knew how interviews could be. I asked him a brief question about an error I found, and it turned into shop talk where I asked a shitload of good questions. I think it was the best conversation I’ve ever had during an interview. Rock.
On the way out, Howard asked me “Why should I hire you over someone else?” After stuttering for a second, I answered that I’d throw myself into work, putting in as much time as I was needed even if it meant extra hours . I was so flustered that I don’t remember if I was that clear in my actual response, but that’s what I was trying to get across; I hope my message made it. The rest of the way out was minor small talk about when I could start and the trip to Poland I was taking. I think I should have asked about the other candidates or if I got the job or not, but I still think I did pretty well.
Did I mention the WSJ campus has a duck pond?!